Just another WordPress.com site

Flavor Analogs a Crutch?


Recent forum discussions have me thinking about describing coffee with flavor analogs such as blueberry, chocolate, bergamot, etc. and when I picked up some fresh starfruit and was struggling to find flavor analogs for the fruit (celery, grapefruit) but missing the mark.

Further reflection leads me to believe that people who know starfruit probably just say it tastes like starfruit.  Are flavor analogs a crutch holding us back from knowing what a wet process caturra or a natural bourbon tastes like and really knowing the factors that affect the cup?

I know I’ve got a long way to go myself in this.


One response to “Flavor Analogs a Crutch?

  1. Christo October 5, 2011 at 9:44 pm

    Hey that’s interesting.

    I think the point is communication. We use words that have the intended effect on the listener. Hmm, that sounds disturbingly obvious, but I guess the consequence is that the main thing is what words and meanings the listener knows.

    If, like me, the listener has no idea what “a wet process caturra” or “a natural bourbon” tastes like then these words aren’t useful in that situation.

    Do you think it’s similar when describing music? Some people describe modern music with genre names (dubstep, bangra, bebop) but others find it more useful to say the music sounds “like The Beatles” or “her voice is like Leslie Feist”.

    And after all, people use metaphors and analogies all the time. So why not with flavours?

    Thanks for really making me think about this!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: